Ethos and Pathos

Directions: watch the following video and point out the S.O.A.P.S. and the ethos and pathos. What makes the ethos and pathos effective? What makes the ethos and/or pathos ineffective? Would the clip be as effective if the speaker used only ethos or pathos?

Initial response due before class on Thursday.

Reply to classmate: Find a classmate that you disagree with his/her labeling of one of the elements (or who left out one of the elements) and ask a question that will lead him/her to the discovery of a deeper understanding of that element. For instance, did your classmate truly understand the purpose of the video or the way the speaker used ethos and pathos? Or did your classmate misinterpret how the two were used together in order to achieve the speech? If you cannot find a classmate you disagree with, find a post you agree with and detail why and how your classmate's response was effective.

Reply to classmate due before 5pm on Friday, October 17th.

Unit II Reflection

Directions: You have now written your first English 121 argument. Now, please answer the following questions: Have you ever written a college paper before? How does this assignment compare? How do you think you will use the skills you learned in Unit II in your future essays (in this class and your future college classes)? Do you have any questions about writing a short argument before we move on? (On this last question, if I get a lot of the same answer, we will review in class, rather than me providing you with an individual answer.)

You can respond in paragraph or list form. 200 word maximum.

Due before 5pm on October 9th.

Thesis and Reasons

Directions: after you have presented your theses to the class, type up the workshopped/edited thesis and your two (or more) reasons/topic sentences. For this week, you will not be required to comment on your classmates' blogs, but I would encourage you to see the work that your classmates are doing in case you are still struggling.

For students presenting on Tuesday, September 29th, your blog is due before class on October 2nd. If you present on Thursday, the blog will be due by 10pm on October 3rd.

5 points for being on time.
5 points for following directions (you must have at least two reasons to support your thesis).

No reply to/from classmate.

Introduction, Thesis, Body, and Conclusion

Directions: Watch the video below and answer the proceeding questions. The direct link to the video is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QleRgTBMX88.

1. Who does the speaker identify as her audience?
2. What is the speaker's hook? How does that hook work with her argument?
3. What is the context for her argument? How does she center the audience in the argument?
4. What do you imagine was her academic/thesis question? What is the argument/thesis?
5. What are some of the parts of the body of the argument? What are some examples she gives to support her argument? How does she make those examples relevant to the audience?
6. What is her conclusion?

Due before class on Thursday, September 25th. Be sure to perform all of your homework readings before performing this blog, through the readings from September 23rd.

Reply to a classmate: in the spirit of embracing wrongness, find a post that says something different than what you said (in any large or small way), and consider how your classmate labeled the various parts of the argument. Pick one part of your classmate's responses that you agree or disagree with and detail for your classmate why you agree or disagree. When I say detail, I mean be specific. If you and your classmates all said precisely the same thing, then consider what you all might have missed in the video and then describe that for your classmate in your reply.

Reply due before 5pm on Friday, September 26th.

Determining Arguments

Directions: Watch the video (if you have trouble accessing the video from Blogger, go directly to YouTube address: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSO_d1svtfU).

What is the main argument of the video? How does the introduction of the video support this argument? What about the main support (what types of main support are there?)? What would make the middle part more convincing, if you feel it does not effectively support the main argument? How does the conclusion of the video work to wrap up the whole argument?

Note: If you wish to comment on the video, please perform the assignment first, and then comment.

(You might think that listening to parts of this video is torturous, but push through).

Due before class on Thursday, September 18th.

Reply to a classmate: Find a classmate you can politely disagree with, and comment on his/her blog.

Note: Disagree with what you think your classmate misdiagnosed or mislabeled as part of the argument, especially the evidence. If you wish to disagree with his/her opinion, do so, but please perform the assigned reply first.

Due by 5pm on September 19th.

Stay helpful and professional!

Unit One Reflection

Directions: You have now performed a college-level English assignment. Now, please answer the following questions: Have you ever written a summary or a paraphrase before? How does this assignment compare? How do you think you will use these skills in your future papers (in this class and your future college classes)? Do you have any questions about summary and paraphrase before we move on? (On this last question, if I get a lot of the same answer, we will review in class, rather than me providing you with an individual answer.)

You can respond in paragraph or list form. 200 word maximum.

Due before 5pm on September 11th.

Reading Like an Academic

Directions: Summarize your experience with the three-read process of the Anne Lamott text (not what you learned, but how the process helped you read this text, and might help you read other texts in the future). If the process did not help your comprehension of the Lamott text, please state so, but summarize why you did not benefit from this method of reading and what you might do instead to help with text comprehension. The post should not state emotion or opinion about either the text or the three-read process, but should, instead, concentrate on explaining the experience objectively. Your reply should be no longer than 200 words. (Due before class on September 4th.)

Reply: Comment on a classmate's ability to relate his/her experience in the fashion of a summary. If you believe s/he wrote more of a narrative/analysis than a summary, make one suggestion for what s/he might do for his/her summary for the Davidson text. Your response needs to be at least three sentences long, and must contain constructive criticism. (Due before 5pm on September 5th)

Stay professional with your posts. Also, remember that this is a community forum. Take what your classmates say with a grain of salt, but also take advantage of the crowdsourcing.

There will be links I will provide in-post in order to clarify the meaning of words and ideas. Sometimes Blogger will sneak in its own links. These will be underlined twice and are ads. I would encourage you to look up unknown words and ideas on your own. If not for your own mental stimulation, collecting words will help you build your extra credit project.